and the marketplace will be the ultimate decider.
and the marketplace will be the ultimate decider.That's the nice thing about America, we can all have different opinions.
I'm in my late 50's, and that's likely why I like both, old and newer school stuff.In my area it is the exact opposite. Us "old guys" like black rifles. Our youngins like the crap we had in the 70's. I like it all, but having been around the block now, I like things that work. Lose barrel nuts, cracked stocks, pretty wood, just gets torn up. Just me though.
The starting MSRP for a new basic Henry PCC is in the $925 range.It’s a big pond, plenty of market share for all tastes.
I’m sure we’re all aware that some models of Ruger’s PC Carbine have an MSRP of $1009.
Both would fit in the PDW catagory I would think.M1 Carbines are more of a PDW than a PCC.![]()
I suppose, but I still take exception to calling the M1 Carbine a PCC.Both would fit in the PDW catagory I would think.
I 100% agree with you. The .30 caliber M1 Carbine cartridge, while obviously not designed to be a powerful rifle cartridge, was indeed designed to be fired from a lightweight, short overall length, rifle, (hence the cartridge being called the 'M1 Carbine'.I suppose, but I still take exception to calling the M1 Carbine a PCC.
Technically, the M1 Carbine is a CCC (Carbine Caliber Carbine)I 100% agree with you. The .30 caliber M1 Carbine cartridge, while obviously not designed to be a powerful rifle cartridge, was indeed designed to be fired from a lightweight, short overall length, rifle, (hence the cartridge being called the 'M1 Carbine'.
Although the M1 Carbine round may have similarities to some handgun cartridges, it was not intended for handgun use... It was intended for use in a Carbine, (Rifle).
So, you are correct in not considering an M1 Carbine to be a 'PCC', (Pistol Caliber Carbine), because the M1 Carbine cartridge is not a pistol cartridge.
M1 Carbine Cartridge...
The .30 Carbine (7.62×33mm) is a rimless carbine/rifle cartridge used in the M1 carbine introduced in the 1940s. It is a light rifle round designed to be fired from the M1 carbine's 18-inch (458 mm) barrel.
I actually never referred to an M1 Carbine as such. My comparison was only to a light weight semi auto rifle.I suppose, but I still take exception to calling the M1 Carbine a PCC.
My mistake then.I actually never referred to an M1 Carbine as such. My comparison was only to a light weight semi auto rifle.
The receiver looks like they took a Big Boy in rough and machined it different and with the semi auto trigger group a new carbine is born. LolI think the block shaped forearm is what he’s referring to about the Crossman. The shape of the receiver made me think of a Franchi shotgun. I like it.
The .30 Carbine is classified as an "intermediate" cartridge and not a pistol cartridge.I suppose, but I still take exception to calling the M1 Carbine a PCC.
I guess that's why I take exception to it being called or compared to a PCC.The .30 Carbine is classified as an "intermediate" cartridge and not a pistol cartridge.
Since PDW's can be anything from sharp pencils and car keys to shoulder-fired AT weapons, you are correct - PDW can mean anything to the person saying it.Pdw is one of those terms I really do not get. I kind of get the gist on one hand, but on the other, nope.
Personal Defense Weapon. I have been schooled on it a few times here in forum land.
The issue is, the term can mean anything to the peson saying it. As it should. The problem is folks say it like it has some specific application.
I just think its odd.
If I am under personal attack by drug runners, maybe a rpg is a pdw, or a laws, or a patriot missile?
A personal defense weapon (PDW) is usually defined as a light, compact and easy to use firearm, generally intended for self-defense and security rather than warfare and infantry.Since PDW's can be anything from sharp pencils and car keys to shoulder-fired AT weapons, you are correct - PDW can mean anything to the person saying it.
The way things are going now, I wouldn't mind having a couple of shoulder-fired AT weapons. A Stinger or two would be nice also.
We are getting off-topic here, but I like being facetious responding to some replies. With the militarization of the nation's police forces (BearCat's and Sentinel's come to mind) and biden's threat of F15's, shoulder-fired AT and AA weapons just might be needed by the citizenry for self-defense and security.... generally intended for self-defense and security rather than warfare and infantry.
I'm not sure if shoulder fired AT weapons fall into that category.
However, you are correct that the definition changes due to the context.