Ruger Forum banner
1 - 20 of 35 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
84 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I recently inherited this .338 WM from my dad.

The story of this gun begins on a guided moose hunt in Alaska when he got the Bejesus scarred out of him by a rather large bear. He said he was afraid to take a shot with his trusty .308.

Upon returning home, he purchased this M77. Normally dad was a gas & oil only kind of guy that didn’t believe in a lot of modifications to anything. However, the gun has been ported and has a decent trigger pull of about 3 lbs.

So my next project will be to make this gun a bit more user friendly. I have some questions:

Pulling the trigger on this beast results in your shoulder feeling like you just got punched by Mike Tyson. Is there a direct fit recoil pad for these guns available that will calm it down some? Name and numbers please… I’m sure it would take multiple sessions to sight it in as is. It isn’t fun to shoot.

I plan to use it at the big bore range for 600+ yard shooting. The 3x9 Leupold that is on it is very nice, but I’m thinking something like a 4.5-14x40 would be better suited for these ranges. Would that power glass be enough or do I need to think bigger?

I have been reading reviews on the Timney triggers for these rifles. Quite a few guys have said they love the results, but had to buy 2 because they got carried away with the file while fitting. Is it that tough to do? I’m not opposed to taking it to a Smith, if it is over my pay grade.

I really want to do this gun proud in my dads honor. I will be making some kind of wood inserts for the stock, and plan on showing it some love.

I love the other 16 Rugers in my safe, but right now, this one not so much.
Wood Grey Door Wall Tints and shades
 

· Registered
A few Rugers and some other firearms.
Joined
·
938 Posts
I have a Pachmayr Decellerator on my Hawkeye .338 (laminate wood stock-no brake) and it does a pretty good job, not painful to shoot at all, but still bucks pretty good. I believe it's grind to fit though. As memory serves, the plastic stocked models do have a prefit pad available from Kick Eez or Limbsaver. Check their web sites.

As for the scope, a Nikon 4-12 came on mine, (bought it from an old fellow at a show who didn't need a .338 WM anymore) and I've actually been considering a 2-7 or even a 1.5-5 Leupold. Less can be more on a .338 WM. I'm in the hardwood forests more often than not and want the field of view, eye relief, and quicker target acquisition. I suppose a 4.5-14 or a 4-12 would do well if long range shooting were in the future. A much lower power scope would still suit me out to about 300yds, (as far as I would shoot).
 

· Registered
Joined
·
421 Posts
I think that thin butt stock design might be part of the culprit. I have a .338 WM in a Ruger Guide Gun and it is my go to rifle every year. It has a muzzle brake of course and the recoil is about the same as a .270 and the gun is really accurate and handy. I see you have a muzzle brake but perhaps they are not all created equal. Good luck......
 

· Registered
A few Rugers and some other firearms.
Joined
·
938 Posts
I missed the part where you said, ''I plan to use it at the big bore range for 600+ yard shooting.'' Yeah, I'd get the Timney trigger and more scope then. I put a Burris Xtream Tactical II 5-25X on a .30/06 target rifle for long range and groundhogs. Got it on clearance for more than 50% off as it was discontinued.

Edit to say, I agree with Corndog, get a good heavy stock on it and save the boat paddle in the closet.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
574 Posts
That's an awesome 338 and a great story.

As for Rugers I don't like, I have to say I just cannot get behind the Wrangler. I had one and detested it, it just never grew on me, the finish flaked off, and for only $80 more I was able to get a very nice used Single Six. I also sold a 30 carbine Blackhawk. There was nothing wrong with it per se but it just never grew on me like my other Blackhawks have.
 

· Corps Commander NGV
Joined
·
9,572 Posts
There are a great many Ruger models that I have never handled or fired. The Rugers I have gotten to shoot have all been a good experience. The OP's .338WM looks like an awesome hunting rifle for Alaska, and a good recoil pad would make it even better. For the OP's intended use as a target rifle, increased weight will make shooting it much more pleasant. I agree with dropping that action into a Boyd's laminate stock of whatever style he likes. A larger, heavier scope with more magnification makes sense for both target shooting and recoil mitigation. You can choose the recoil pad type and thickness when you order your stock from Boyds.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
162 Posts
If you want to keep the skeleton stock, maybe try a slip on pad? As long as it doesn't increase length of pull too much. For scopes, I like the Sightron S-Tac 3-16x42 for that task. Awesome glass, tracking, and good eye relief for heavy kickers. I've got one on a 375 Ruger and getting ready to put another on my M77 338. For triggers, get the Rifle Basix. I have both Timney and Rifle Basix. To my feel, the Rifle Basix is every bit as good as the Timney and you don't have to file for the safety engagement as it is adjustable with a screw.
 

· Registered
Northwest Oregon
Joined
·
2,649 Posts
I own several Ruger revolvers and Ruger Rifles. I would not mind a Ruger shotgun. I have yet to see a Ruger semi-auto pistol that I would buy.
 
  • Love
Reactions: krag96
1 - 20 of 35 Posts
Top