Have you tried shooting it with a real ammo?
Reading is fundamental....Definition of beating a dead horse: This thread.
Definition of you can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink: This thread.
No.. but I have no doubt that the ammo would feed and eject flawlessly as did its predecessor. THAT wasn't the problem!Have you tried shooting it with a real ammo?
Not if the waterhole is contaminated!Definition of beating a dead horse: This thread.
Definition of you can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink: This thread.
Similar worded warnings in the manuals for other Ruger pistols I have. e.g. from LCPII and American Compact manuals both put it a bit differenty: "When the slide is operated by hand, there can be a failure to extract the cartridge from the chamber, or a failure to eject the cartridge clear of the pistol".. . . When the slide is operated by hand, pull vigorously back on the slide to ensure the cartridge is extracted and ejected from the chamber. Otherwise, the cartridge may drop on top of the magazine or remain held to the breech-face by the extractor. . . .
That's not a true statement! I in fact DID test the firearm for manual ejection.. not only with dummy rounds but also with 2 different types of live ammo. The results were the same as its predecessor ..IT WOULD NOT EJECT LIVE AMMUNITION MANUALLY. I saw no purpose in live firing it as I was confident that it would eject spent brass as did the predecessor. Inasmuch as this firearm is crafted after the original LCP model (of which I do happen to own one of) one would think that it would operate similarly. My LCP manually ejects rounds consistently... flawlessly without error, as it should. The confidence was lost after testing.The customer was not happy with the result, unwilling to test the Ruger gunsmiths solution to his problem. He has lost confidence in that pistol without testing.
Since you have both an LCP and a Max, do the ejection ports on both have the same dimensions? Will the slides interchange?My LCP manually ejects rounds consistently... flawlessly without error, as it should.
You are correct. Where your thinking is flawed is thinking that not ejecting a dummy round is a gun failure. It is NOTnonsense , there is something they call a "warranty" , so when you purchase a brand new firearm and that firearm has a warranty attached they are absolutely "obligated" to repair or replace a defective product , it does sound like the OP's first firearm was defective as they replaced it , it sounds like he was soured by the whole experience and did not give the replacement a fair shake , but to say Ruger is under no obligation to repair or replace a warrantied product is ridiculous
this thread is like shooting a horse dead , kicking it , resurrecting it so you can do it all over againYou are correct. Where your thinking is flawed is thinking that not ejecting a dummy round is a gun failure. It is NOT
Take it to the range, shoot at least a box of ammo through it. If it fails, then contact Ruger.
The slides DO NOT interchange. I no longer have possession of the Max and I did not take any dimensions.Since you have both an LCP and a Max, do the ejection ports on both have the same dimensions? Will the slides interchange?
I attempted to eject both dummy rounds and live rounds.. it failed.. as did it's predecessor after close to 200 rounds of live ammo. Why would I want to piss away additional $$ on this? I'm convinced there's a design issue.You are correct. Where your thinking is flawed is thinking that not ejecting a dummy round is a gun failure. It is NOT
Take it to the range, shoot at least a box of ammo through it. If it fails, then contact Ruger.
I'm certainly not a gunsmith nor do I profess to be one. I did try a couple different brands of ammo to no avail. I'm certainly not going to machine a brand new firearm. If Ruger sees fit to machine it and it's operable.. then I would certainly keep it as I really like the fit and feel.. I highly doubt that's going to happen. We shall wait and see what Ruger's determination is.I will take that piece of junk off your hands for $20, seeing as it's been returned from Ruger and you have not fired it. My over and under won't eject unspent shells, either.
Being a gunsmithy sort, I would first try a few different brands of ammo. Maybe I can fix it where Ruger can't.
I agree... it seems posters are not reading previous posts before adding their rwo cents and recommendations.this thread is like shooting a horse dead , kicking it , resurrecting it so you can do it all over again