This is exactly the point I was trying to make, My intention was not to trash the cartridge, but to point out what I perceived to be a biased article. To each his own, but personally I am not ready to drink the Kool-Aid. I do respect the maturity on this forum, where we can disagree on something without attacking one another.quote:Originally posted by KP97DC
This is just my view on reviews of Cartridges, Guns, and most anything else. Which would be more reliable? Check something out for yourself, or rely on someone that is furnished products and other incentives to review them? Do you think a writer that wrote a bad report about a product would get to do another? I would rely more on a report from a majority of the members on this Board than any Writer. Thats not to say that there's not good writers, because there is. They have to be loyal to the hand that feeds them.
No, I don't think he's on Ruger's payroll. Because if he were, he'd be on every gun makers' payroll(those he had reviewed). He just never say anything bad about the guns he review. He stated this himself. If a gun isn't up to his standard, he wouldn't spend the time and energy to test and review it. I started reading the Gunblast web site since I started shooting in 2003. After a while, I stopped going there if I'm looking for what's "bad" about a certain gun/product. I still go there for entertaining readings. Sort of like enjoying fun infomercials...quote:Originally posted by Checkmate
Is this guy Jeff Quinn on Rugers payroll?