I'd like to carry an LCR--I'm a devoted revolver fan, so I think it would work for me. I also can roll my own, so I've narrowed my choice down to the LCR in 9, 327 and 357. They all have the same stainless steel frame, so my decision is hinging on other factors. I am going to list some pros and cons, and I hope folks will weigh in with thoughts.
The 357 makes a lot of sense. I have a lot of other 357 revolvers, and there is ammunition choice versatility. My concern is that I have a scandium/titanium S&W, and shooting 357 out of that is a painful experience (though it weighs about 3 ounces less than the LCR). I suppose I could hand load light 357s, or perhaps get lower recoil defensive rounds (I'm a bit shy about using reloads for defense). Of course I could use 38+P, but then following with 357s is tough unless you clean the chambers in the cylinders.
The 9 has moon clips, which I consider an advantage and I have a revolver that uses them in 357. Reading other threads on this site and elsewhere suggest that 9+P approaches light 357 power (give or take) but doesn't have quite as much kick nor muzzle flash. But there is the crimp jump issue.
The 327, on paper, sounds like a great compromise. Cannelured bullets, ballistics approaching 357, softer kick/muzzle flash, and ONE EXTRA ROUND! But, other than 32 H&H magnums and a rare finding of 327 self defense rounds, I cannot locate any "plinking" 327s. The brass is available, and I can load my own (assuming I can find a die set), but it concerns me that the ammo is virtually no where to be found). I don't know if this is a general state of affairs or if we are just in a lag time between new 327 platforms being introduced and ammo manufacturers ramping up production?
I'm hoping for input on intangibles, or opinions of folks who have fired all three. I know there are a lot of ballistics arguments that can be made to support multiple points of view, and I'm not really interested in those as I think they are somewhat minor differences in terms of what will matter if I ever have to pull the trigger in anger.
The 357 makes a lot of sense. I have a lot of other 357 revolvers, and there is ammunition choice versatility. My concern is that I have a scandium/titanium S&W, and shooting 357 out of that is a painful experience (though it weighs about 3 ounces less than the LCR). I suppose I could hand load light 357s, or perhaps get lower recoil defensive rounds (I'm a bit shy about using reloads for defense). Of course I could use 38+P, but then following with 357s is tough unless you clean the chambers in the cylinders.
The 9 has moon clips, which I consider an advantage and I have a revolver that uses them in 357. Reading other threads on this site and elsewhere suggest that 9+P approaches light 357 power (give or take) but doesn't have quite as much kick nor muzzle flash. But there is the crimp jump issue.
The 327, on paper, sounds like a great compromise. Cannelured bullets, ballistics approaching 357, softer kick/muzzle flash, and ONE EXTRA ROUND! But, other than 32 H&H magnums and a rare finding of 327 self defense rounds, I cannot locate any "plinking" 327s. The brass is available, and I can load my own (assuming I can find a die set), but it concerns me that the ammo is virtually no where to be found). I don't know if this is a general state of affairs or if we are just in a lag time between new 327 platforms being introduced and ammo manufacturers ramping up production?
I'm hoping for input on intangibles, or opinions of folks who have fired all three. I know there are a lot of ballistics arguments that can be made to support multiple points of view, and I'm not really interested in those as I think they are somewhat minor differences in terms of what will matter if I ever have to pull the trigger in anger.