Joined
·
1,105 Posts
I've searched and read as many threads on recoil that I can find. It seems for everyone who thinks the recoil is too harsh, someone else thinks its' fine.
Here's what I'm really asking - How does the recoil in either gun compare to shooting +P from a SW model 36?
I've only shot about 15 rounds through a 4" SW 357
Last time at the range, I shot 35 rounds of +P through the SW model 36.
Yes, I felt the difference in recoil but it was far from what I would call unmanageable. The model 36 I'm shooting is from the early to mid 80's and is not marked for +P, but there is as much difference in opinion whether the old j frames can handle +P as there is opinion on the best caliber for SD.
Is there any comparison at all between a Ruger marked for 357 versus a 30 year old SW j frame shooting +P?
Thanks
Here's what I'm really asking - How does the recoil in either gun compare to shooting +P from a SW model 36?
I've only shot about 15 rounds through a 4" SW 357
Last time at the range, I shot 35 rounds of +P through the SW model 36.
Yes, I felt the difference in recoil but it was far from what I would call unmanageable. The model 36 I'm shooting is from the early to mid 80's and is not marked for +P, but there is as much difference in opinion whether the old j frames can handle +P as there is opinion on the best caliber for SD.
Is there any comparison at all between a Ruger marked for 357 versus a 30 year old SW j frame shooting +P?
Thanks