Seems everyone generally agrees that a longer barrel makes for longer, more accurate shooting.

Wouldn't that just be a carbine?
Wouldn't that just be a carbine?<snip>
If you stuck the 5.56 round into a PCC, then you would have something…😎
A well designed 9mm pistol caliber carbine, and many SMG based semi auto firearms with a stock, are capable of good accuracy at 100 yards and that’s generally considered the effective range for SMGs like the UZI, Colt 6450 and MP5 in semi auto mode.If you have not, do a meat target with a nice +p 124 out of a 16" @ 70 yards. Do the same with you favorite 5.56/..223. I was surprised. After 100 yards, no 9mm is reliable. And given the unreal option of "juat one gun" of course I would have a .223 wylde....
But my observation is inside 100, the 9 is fine and you could argue more efficient (price, burnt powder, limited range) for the application from a 16" barrel with the +p loading.
Just this hill jacks opinion, nothing serious !
Why yes sir it would. It would be an RCC.Seems everyone generally agrees that a longer barrel makes for longer, more accurate shooting.
Wouldn't that just be a carbine?![]()
I do not doubt that, a nice side effect of the extra barrel on mine is there is NO discernable flash if the moon is out and its not very noisy at all. Like a hefty .22lr. But a 12" would be more portable for sure!The 9mm gets max velocity in 10"-12". 16" barrels are just to make them rifles.
Touching off a 5.56x45 in a 10.5" is lightning and thunder by comparison. The 9mm PCC excels at low flash and bang.I do not doubt that, a nice side effect of the extra barrel on mine is there is NO discernable flash if the moon is out and its not very noisy at all. Like a hefty .22lr. But a 12" would be more portable for sure!
I was taught two to the chest, two to the head and one to the groin. Will stop them almost immediatelyOne of my defense instructors says being easy to conceal is the only thing a handgun does well. A pistol wound is much more survivable than a rifle wound.
I don't expect them to get up and talk, and if they have a weapon pointed at me I will shoot if they are up or down. Survival of the fittest and fastest, dead men cannot testify......Yeah but they better be standing when you do it. Evidently they can tell if you shot them while they were down.
Forensics says dead men can testify.I don't expect them to get up and talk, and if they have a weapon pointed at me I will shoot if they are up or down. Survival of the fittest and fastest, dead men cannot testify......
People have shot nickels tossed in the air with a 1873 Colt 45. You just need to practice.Most things I was told many years ago, and ignored, have come back to be true as my understanding grew. A sidearms only use is to get you to a long gun.
One of those things that, at least for me, is the superiority of a long gun over a pistol.
It seems so obvious. But such a painful fact of life. My M9 did and does everything a gun is supposed to do. No reason you can't hit a running jackrabbit or cotton tail with one. No reason at all......
Except range. The difference on a target at 10 yards vs 25 yard and 50 yards maybe the 1/2 the width of your front post, and holdover. With your outstreched arm. I get point shooting, hell I do it subconciously fooling myself into "must be a combat hold" or some foolishness.
But enter the pcc. Tougher to carry? Yes. But success breads comfort, and comfort joy, and joy practice. So to sum it up I crunched some numbers...
I shoot my pcc 87.9% more than my 92fs as of this moment in time. Since 2019. Before that, my 92fs was my single 9x19 weapon. And I shot it alot, had copious amounts of training with it. I am still passable with it. The ONLY advantage it has is portability. No small consideration, but I want to devise a way to make the pcc just as portable.
I CAN hit a moving eye socket with my pcc now. Or my ar's. Doing it with the pistol is simply luck.
Mission accepted.
From 15 feet. Sure. I can't but can do clays. Send it from a skeet launcher out to 20 yards, My pistol skills start looking shabby!People have shot nickels tossed in the air with a 1873 Colt 45. You just need to practice.
My wife, 2 children and myself were in the playground of an RV park when bullets started dropping around us. I got us out of there quick. Had the manger call the police and I went hunting. I found the 3 idiots tossing dirt clods in the air and shooting at them with their pistols. Made sure they stayed put until the police arrived.People have shot nickels tossed in the air with a 1873 Colt 45. You just need to practice.
When I shoot clays with a handgun, there is 8 miles of my dads dairy/wheat fields. Not something I do very often. Funny note, my mom gets a tickle out of watching me, my sister/bil and my dad do that.My wife, 2 children and myself were in the playground of an RV park when bullets started dropping around us. I got us out of there quick. Had the manger call the police and I went hunting. I found the 3 idiots tossing dirt clods in the air and shooting at them with their pistols. Made sure they stayed put until the police arrived.
Yes but can you take that pcc or AR into the mall?Most things I was told many years ago, and ignored, have come back to be true as my understanding grew. A sidearms only use is to get you to a long gun.
One of those things that, at least for me, is the superiority of a long gun over a pistol.
It seems so obvious. But such a painful fact of life. My M9 did and does everything a gun is supposed to do. No reason you can't hit a running jackrabbit or cotton tail with one. No reason at all......
Except range. The difference on a target at 10 yards vs 25 yard and 50 yards maybe the 1/2 the width of your front post, and holdover. With your outstreched arm. I get point shooting, hell I do it subconciously fooling myself into "must be a combat hold" or some foolishness.
But enter the pcc. Tougher to carry? Yes. But success breads comfort, and comfort joy, and joy practice. So to sum it up I crunched some numbers...
I shoot my pcc 87.9% more than my 92fs as of this moment in time. Since 2019. Before that, my 92fs was my single 9x19 weapon. And I shot it alot, had copious amounts of training with it. I am still passable with it. The ONLY advantage it has is portability. No small consideration, but I want to devise a way to make the pcc just as portable.
I CAN hit a moving eye socket with my pcc now. Or my ar's. Doing it with the pistol is simply luck.
Mission accepted.
I have a Ruger Deerfield carbine .44 REM. mag. If the SHTF I would grab it my Redhawk and my AR15. The Deerfield would be my close quarters firearm. Handles quick, hits hard and has been very reliable. Only drawback is the rotary magazine.If you have not, do a meat target with a nice +p 124 out of a 16" @ 70 yards. Do the same with your favorite 5.56/..223. I was surprised. After 100 yards, no 9mm is reliable. And given the unreal option of "juat one gun" of course I would have a .223 wylde....
But my observation is inside 100, the 9 is fine and you could argue more efficient (price, burnt powder, limited range) for the application from a 16" barrel with the +p loading.
Just this hill jacks opinion, nothing serious !
I got my Marlin Camp 9 in a trade, friend of mine traded it to me for an IBM PC.