This site has a thread dedicated to Trail Boss : Trail Boss? . So I thought I'd start one on Ramshot's True Blue and get peoples thoughts on this powder (in all calibers) as I finally got my hands on a pound of it. Thought I'd try it as I've heard some good things about it.
The powder itself is very fine and meters very well. Its a double-base, spherical powder according to the company literature. Very consistent throws. I've yet had to 'throw one back' other than when first setting up the charge. Nice!!
It really sticks to the walls of the plastic tube that holds the powder in the hornady powder measure. That is the only minor complaint here.
It's burn rate #40 on 'one' chart puts it right next to HS-6 and AA#5 (#41 and #42). Unique is back at #31 and 2400 at #54. Another Chart puts it slower than HS-6 and closer to AA#7 leaving HS-6 behind. A Couple other charts puts it slower than AA#7. Still it is 'somewhere' between Unique and 2400.
Take your pick! It does take more powder than Unique or Green Dot to get to same velocity. Draw your own conclusions...
As for shooting it seems to burn 'hot'. My revolver barrels tend to heat up more than they do with Green Dot or Unique. The case gets a black 'burn' area around the mouth as well after shooting. Just an observation. Does seem to burn clean though.
I just started to explore it with .45 Colt loads so the powder is still new to me. Here are my results so far.
Ruger .45 Colt BH 5 1/2" barrel
8.0g True Blue, 250g RNFP, CCI-300, 801fps, _9 SD, 32 ES, 14 Shots
8.5g True Blue, 250g RNFP, CCI-300, 860fps, 11 SD, 30 ES, 15 Shots
9.0g True Blue, 250g RNFP, CCI-300, 898fps, 11 SD, 33 ES, 10 Shots
9.3g True Blue, 250g RNFP, CCI-300, 941fps, _6 SD, 20 ES, 15 Shots (different day and temp)
9.5g True Blue, 250g RNFP, CCI-300, 940fps, _8 SD, 29 ES, 11 Shots
The powder is dense and doesn't fill the case like some other powders. But because it meters so well that isn't a big concern. Also as you can see it is still consistent from shot to shot.
I shot 15 of each load. The reason for 10 shots and 11 shots is because my chronograph was 'erroring' on me for some reason in the late afternoon. Only had 15 of each to test. Still it gives you an idea. No load yet picked for most accurate. Nothing has stood out as 'the load', however consistency is quite good.
I do believe the above tests are SAMMI loads from what I can 'glean' from manuals and internet. Data is pretty sparse on this powder. Another reason for this thread!
The powder itself is very fine and meters very well. Its a double-base, spherical powder according to the company literature. Very consistent throws. I've yet had to 'throw one back' other than when first setting up the charge. Nice!!
It's burn rate #40 on 'one' chart puts it right next to HS-6 and AA#5 (#41 and #42). Unique is back at #31 and 2400 at #54. Another Chart puts it slower than HS-6 and closer to AA#7 leaving HS-6 behind. A Couple other charts puts it slower than AA#7. Still it is 'somewhere' between Unique and 2400.
As for shooting it seems to burn 'hot'. My revolver barrels tend to heat up more than they do with Green Dot or Unique. The case gets a black 'burn' area around the mouth as well after shooting. Just an observation. Does seem to burn clean though.
I just started to explore it with .45 Colt loads so the powder is still new to me. Here are my results so far.
Ruger .45 Colt BH 5 1/2" barrel
8.0g True Blue, 250g RNFP, CCI-300, 801fps, _9 SD, 32 ES, 14 Shots
8.5g True Blue, 250g RNFP, CCI-300, 860fps, 11 SD, 30 ES, 15 Shots
9.0g True Blue, 250g RNFP, CCI-300, 898fps, 11 SD, 33 ES, 10 Shots
9.3g True Blue, 250g RNFP, CCI-300, 941fps, _6 SD, 20 ES, 15 Shots (different day and temp)
9.5g True Blue, 250g RNFP, CCI-300, 940fps, _8 SD, 29 ES, 11 Shots
The powder is dense and doesn't fill the case like some other powders. But because it meters so well that isn't a big concern. Also as you can see it is still consistent from shot to shot.
I shot 15 of each load. The reason for 10 shots and 11 shots is because my chronograph was 'erroring' on me for some reason in the late afternoon. Only had 15 of each to test. Still it gives you an idea. No load yet picked for most accurate. Nothing has stood out as 'the load', however consistency is quite good.
I do believe the above tests are SAMMI loads from what I can 'glean' from manuals and internet. Data is pretty sparse on this powder. Another reason for this thread!