Okay, I realize that my post wasn't exactly overflowing with content, but my hunting with those guns took place back in the 70s and 80s when I was determined to proove I could keep up with the guys when it came to shooting the big stuff and, back then, the 44 mag was THE big stuff.
My Super Blackhawk was not a Hunter, because they did not have the Hunter in the 70s. It was a 7 1/2" Super Blackhawk without a scope, but I took my first deer, ever with it, so Blackhawks will always have a special place in my heart.
The Super Redhawk 7 1/2" was scoped with a Leupold 2x. Wasn't too crazy about the looks of the SRH, but the SRH was my mentor's favorite, so I tried it. Believe me, I forgot all about the looks when I started to shoot it. With almost any factory ammo, it would group 5 shots under 2" at 50 yards. However, the weight of the gun with scope was at the absolute max for what I could hold and shoot offhand. Don't think I could handle it, these days. Of course, guys do have more wrist and arm strength so take that for what it's worth.
It also took me a good long while to build up to where I could manage the recoil of the 44, but, again, might be a different story for guys. I will say that the grips and weight of the SRH made shooting the 44 more manageable for me.
Either the SBH Hunter or the SRH are big, heavy guns, so if you are carrying a lot, that might be a factor for you. Not a big deal if shooting from a blind or a bench, but those are tanks. if I decide to take a deer these days, it will be with my scoped GP-100 4" and I'll just get as close as needed to get the job done.