Ruger Forum banner
21 - 40 of 92 Posts
Discussion starter · #21 ·
Out of curiosity, what led you to narrow your search to just SR762 and Scar-17 (since there are so many 308 rifles out there)? And what has you stuck between these two? So, how did you get to this point is my question.

I have a S&W M&P 10 that I have yet to see if I like :p :eek:
Looked at an M&P10 and it just looks too plain Jane to me. I'm a fan of both Rugers and FNH and both are piston operated.

I would get the ruger instead of the scar but I would take an m1a over either.
I actually already have an M1A. Sweet gun, but I feel like it's almost too nice to shoot! I consider it the flagship of my safe. The next 308 will be a range workhorse.

Ruger is not luck of the draw. No problems with S/N's above 8XXX. And great range reports on the new production rifles.

Sig? Don't have enough data to confirm a S/N cutoff. I would be a little hesitant on Sig for that reason.

Hate to tell you, but a TRP (Springfield 1911, their second best model) just failed out of the box. And reading, this is not unique. Tried and not so true. So I don't have much faith in Springfield.
I too had a Springfield Loaded 1911 fail.
 
I've decided I need a .308 auto-loader in my life. I've narrowed my choices down to the Ruger SR762 and the SCAR17. Both are piston driven, both have 16" barrels and so on. The obvious difference is price. I'd like to hear some opinions from those who have one or the other, clearly there will be more SR762 owners here....
I would have said the obvious difference is weight. That's the most obvious difference, in my opinion, between the SCAR 17s and any semi 7.62 piston gun. The SCAR is expensive, but so are all of them.

You said your M1A is too "nice" to shoot. Is that due to price? Or just that it's nice? You could buy a second one and keep one nice, if you like the platform.

FWIW, I find the charging handle on the SCAR to be a plus. It's a big plus that it isn't by my face like on an AR. And I like that it operates as a bolt release, forward assist, whatever else you need. I also like that it is reversible, unlike an M1A, AK, etc. But obviously plenty of people do not like that.
 
SR-762! for reasons above and I was comparing to Sig 716, M&P 10 and others mentioned above. Check out discussion on SigTalk related issue too (not derailing from Ruger forum) but has a bit more info in that thread....
 
M1A, SR762, SCAR in that order.

For me the SCAR is just too different. I don't like it. I concede it's a terrific rifle. I just don't like it. The fact it's $2700 isn't helping to change my mind either.

If I was looking for an AR style .308 I would lean heavily towards the SR762. Now they've worked out the bugs all the reports suggest it's a real nice shooter. You can find them for about $1500-1600. Beats the hell out of $2700 for a SCAR.

Now to my personal favorite, the M1A. Simple, accurate, durable, tried and true. Less than $1300 in basic black. About $1400 in wood. Great rifle, great value.

Honorable mention should go to the S&W MP10. I've never shot one but every thing I read about them is good. I've seen them for around $1200-1300. I'm not particularly a S&W fan but this rifle would be on my at least look at it list.

Good luck with your search.
 
Looked at an M&P10 and it just looks too plain Jane to me. I'm a fan of both Rugers and FNH and both are piston operated.
Yea, it definitely looks plain Jane. I found a sweet deal and have made it look a bit better. I still have yet to shoot it... but enough about that.

Part of me wonders if I should have went with a piston AR-308 platform. The Ruger SR762 has really grown on me. The SCARs are always cool, but I'm too cheap to get one and pay for the mags. I like that the Ruger and most AR-10 style rifles take PMAGS.
 
Discussion starter · #27 ·
You said your M1A is too "nice" to shoot. Is that due to price? Or just that it's nice? You could buy a second one and keep one nice, if you like the platform.
Price isn't a factor in shooting it. They're all expensive and they're all going to get shot. I thought about getting one of their SOCOM or scout models, but I figured I already have the loaded model and was looking for more of a "modern" rifle.

After a ton of research I narrowed it down to the same two as well. what did you end up with?
I haven't ended up with anything yet. Still saving my
Image
. But it's looking like the SCAR will win.
 
What will you use it for? Hunting? Self Defense? Do you plan to someday carry this into battle (who knows)? Look for reliability, service and parts, accuracy...in that order. If you are simply collecting, then your choice is entirely up to you.
We must stop the fantasy and become realistic about choosing a rifle for our individual purposes. Whichever you choose you must become completely familiar with it and train as if for real.
 
Price isn't a factor in shooting it. They're all expensive and they're all going to get shot. I thought about getting one of their SOCOM or scout models, but I figured I already have the loaded model and was looking for more of a "modern" rifle.



I haven't ended up with anything yet. Still saving my
Image
. But it's looking like the SCAR will win.
Cost not a factor I think the scar would win too but with the scar your really looking at a 3k gun after tax and upgrading the trigger the ruger is really a 1,900 gun after tax and trigger upgrade. is the scar worth 1100 more than the ruger? that is the question for me. why are you leaning towards the scar?
 
Good discussion. I'm in the market for a good .308 and have narrowed it down to the SR762 and the M1A Scout Rifle. My friend in New Mexico swears by his Scout Rifle.
 
Discussion starter · #33 ·
why are you leaning towards the scar?
I already have several ARs. To me, the SR762 would be just that, another AR. But the SCAR 17 would be something different. Has different controls, looks different and can be operated as a pistol if need be.
Other factors include but are not limited to:
FNH's reputation (I feel) is better than Ruger's.
The SCAR has actually seen hard combat and proven itself in battle whereas none of the SRs have. I realize I will not be taking it into combat, but it's nice to know it will hold up under such circumstances.
There is the option of using a factory FN 13" barrel with sights, gas blocks etc to achieve an SBR.
Has the factory option of FDE, but I would probably get the black model.
 
I just picked up a FDE SCAR 17 this weekend. Honestly, it is one of the best battle rifles I've handled or shot if you plan on using it for high round counts. ARs in general don't interest me too much since everyone has one. They're great guns and have been proven time and time again, but I tend to go for the less common stuff.
 
If I had all the money I needed I would get the SCAR17. I love my AR's, I have them in .22LR to .50 Beowulf but with everything the SCAR has to offer it's an easy decision for me. The folding stock, the reciprocating bolt and the light weight are all great reasons. Unless Beretta comes out with a 7.62/.308 ARX rifle before then I'd choose a SCAR. If I was intent on a 7.62 AR it wouldn't be the Ruger. As much as I love many Ruger products, there are better AR's out there.
 
Great conversation here, I have been saving for the SR762, still have it on the plans but listening to all the conversation wondering if I am still have the 762 as the #1 next purchase. I could go shopping this weekend and pickup something else new and ammo and start all over for the SR762.

I do have multiple AR style weapons so I need to sleep on this and make my decision. Thanks for all the feedback, making me think about my next purchase.
 
Discussion starter · #40 ·
I have researched pof, dpms g2, fal, pws, s&w, lmt, Sig and Springfield I'm sure some others too. my criteria has been something that is rock solid reliable and can work well with a suppressor and steel ammo. I do think the scar is best but not sure if it is worth the extra yet. This is a great thread keep it going. I did just read this article

Pat?s Product Review: Ruger?s SR-762 Rifle, by Pat Cascio - SurvivalBlog.com

Sturm, Ruger & Co. SR-762 Rifle - Article - POLICE Magazine

I agree. I've looked at a bunch of different manufaturers. To me, the biggest thing that sets the SR apart from other AR10 style rifles is the piston operating system. POFs are super nice but just too pricey for an AR.
I also looked at PTR and FAL style rifles, which I do like, but I want something more "modern" right now. I would love to get a FAL type someday as well and considered building one once but never did.
I'd also like something from both Nemo Firearms and Noreen Firearms someday for the "big" catridges ie. 300 mag and 30-06 respectivley. The Nemos are as much, if not more than the FN, but the BN36 from Noreen is only about $1600; close to the SR762.
 
21 - 40 of 92 Posts