Ruger Forum banner

Range day: 182 series Mini-14 5.56, 585 Series Mini-30 7.62x39, and 1943 IBM M1 Carbine

1.3K views 6 replies 5 participants last post by  Imarangemaster  
#1 ·
My beauties:

Image


Image


Image


All three would break clay pigeons at 100 yards with every shot from a casual rest, using iron sights and a 6 o'clock hold. That is "practical accuracy" in my book. Good enough for Goblins, Trolls, Zombies, and Raving Insurrectionists.

The Mini-14 was using Lake City 55 grain M193 5.56

The Mini-30 functioned 100%using Czech KOPP ammo

The M1 Carbine was shooting Korean war and Vietnam era Lake City
 
#4 ·
For me, utility is far above aesthetics, so long as a vintage firearm can be returned to OEM configuration.

Point in case: A GI .30 Cal carbine, with a syn stock and an Ultimak rail with appropriate optic is FAR better than the OEM GI unit. I am just guessing, but I think most WWII/KorWar Soldiers and Marines would have MUCH preferred such a "modern" rifle/carbine as opposed to that which they were issued.
 
#5 ·
For me, utility is far above aesthetics, so long as a vintage firearm can be returned to OEM configuration.

Point in case: A GI .30 Cal carbine, with a syn stock and an Ultimak rail with appropriate optic is FAR better than the OEM GI unit. I am just guessing, but I think most WWII/KorWar Soldiers and Marines would have MUCH preferred such a "modern" rifle/carbine as opposed to that which they were issued.
I have plenty of modern guns, that look like modern guns. The aesthetics of the old far surpass the utility, even in new shoes.
 
#7 ·
My Carbine was rebuilt by Red River Arsenal late WW2 (possibly after the war in Europe ended, and it was sent stateside to rehab before re-deploying it to the Pacific) or just after the war.

In refit, it only had the Type II rear sight installed (the rest of the metal is original), and was put in a Winchester stock with Inland 4 rivet hand guard. The stock is stamped RRA on the side. When they came in for inspection/ rebuild, they were separated from their stocks, the barrel/receiver/trigger group in one pile, and wood in another. It is likely late war rebuild, as most post war rebuilds before Korea replaced the Type I and Type II barrel bands with Type III bands with bayonet lugs.

Iy has no import marks, and came from an estate. It is likely an 1960s NRA/DCM carbine, that were sold for cheap. The original barrel band, with partial rebuild with adjustable rear sight is typical of those guns.