Ruger Forum banner
341 - 360 of 1,200 Posts
I wouldn't be surprised that Glock changes nothing unless they were to start losing LE supply contracts to Ruger. Look at Sig P320 history. Military bought into it and dumped Beretta while LE stuck with Glock.

RXM will likely become a defacto alternative civilian Glock clone and nothing more. I can't see Glock changing a thing unless they start losing contract orders. Name a department in history that went to Ruger revolvers over S&W and I'll name 50 that didn’t.
I'm also inclined to believe Glock will not make any notable changes in the near term, but would love to see some. Especially since they are still releasing previous models into the Gen 5 lineup...waiting for that G40.
 
I'm also inclined to believe Glock will not make any notable changes in the near term, but would love to see some. Especially since they are still releasing previous models into the Gen 5 lineup...waiting for that G40.
Not knowing what Gaston’s widow is going to do with the company, watching Glocks future could be interesting.
But I’m with you I’m not holding my breath on Glock changes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr. Pepper Nose
And that is exactly why is is shooting low
You're likely right, but I always wonder with new firearms how consistent front and rear sight alignment are, along with the intended POI range in tandem with the hold method.

Always nice when they already have it noted in the manual.

My SA-35 states a center hold (i.e., top of front post), sighted for 25 yards.

I'm one of those strange ones that reads the manual...some very helpful knowledge in there most of the time; along with the tired legal boiler plate. I really appreciate when they pay attention to detail putting these together.

Springfield Armory SA-35 Manual Excerpt

Image
 
I’m still wondering if Ruger may be talking to police forces to keep them in mind for replacement business. They could undercut prices and the agencies would have little change in operations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChattanoogaPhil
While I do like a lot of the Magpul offerings, I always thought the Ruger American Magpul stocks looked a bit out of place. Almost grabbed one for the cheek weld alone, but decided the Gen I stock was more handy and didn't require removing the cheek rest to remove the bolt. It was also cheaper to modify the existing magwell for AICS mags through Ruger's OEM kit.
Esthetically speaking, I never cared for the looks of the Hunter stock with the high cheek risers. More importantly, they didn't fit me/scope mount height the best. Fortunately, Magpul soon came out with the 0in cheek riser. Perfect height for me plus it changed the looks for the better IMO. And being Magpul... the 0in riser was cheap at only $10.

(apologies to the readership for thread drift)
 
Just got back from quick range test with my RXM running it dry as new right out of the box. Trigger gauge turns in 5-1/2 lbs consistently here after having run about 50-60 rounds through it at the range.

On a scale of 1-5 on my first session, it scores a 3-1/2 maybe 4 due to some issues I ran into.

My ammo was 124 gr fmj reloads from once fired brass in front of 5 grains Unique. The reloader was a professional reloader and I have shot hundreds of rounds of this same batch with no FTF except for a couple light primer strikes by a different gun I no longer own.

This RXM had 2 FTF in the first 15 rounds and they were not from light primer strikes, but failure to cock/set the striker. I have never experienced that before as the trigger appeared dead when squeezed and yet there was a live round loaded in the chamber from the previous round firing, ejecting, and loading this next round. I checked the extracted round and found zero evidence of a primer strike. I didn't take a lot of time diagnosing the condition except to view the slide was completely in battery, so there was no out of battery condition that I could detect.

2 in the first 15 is not a good number IMO. I experienced it again in about the 8th or 9th batch tested during a rapid fire session. I only loaded and shoot 5 at a time when testing functionality.

The second issue is that the rear sight is causing me to shoot left and the groups appear I was shooting a shotgun with 00 buck at both 7 and 10 yards. I brought along my Canik and my SAR K2 45 and shot both to compare groups. The Canik and K2 45 both shoot much nicer groups and center, so I am rather convinced it is not me, but the Ruger rear sight that need adjusting.

I did not mount my optics yet, but will once I adjust the rear sight with my sight pusher. Not much good in trying to co-witness when the factory set sights are off.

The photo is of 2 5 round defensive rapid fire sessions, one with Speer 124Gr +P Gold Dots, and the other 5 rounds with my 124 FMJ reloads. Point of aim was the red circle of which the holes are from prior shots from the other side of the folder paper. The yellow circle is from the rapid fire sessions which if you count was only 9 round through. One round never got through as it was another FTF which occurred, so that makes 3 FTFs in the first 50 rounds tested. :mad:

Next time I go out, I'll lube and bag this gun and see what kind of groups it gets with factory new Winchester ammo. The rear sight will get moved before then as well. At this time, I will not carry this gun as a SD gun because of the FTFs experienced on the first run. The gun was not out of battery either as I checked it for that. It simply failed to set the striker.

Image
 
Attempted to fit my Holosun 407k GR X2. No go. The Holosun K Series footprint lacks rear boss indents, and the front boss indents are not sized to Ruger RXM inserts.

Per data I've seen online, the K series indents are 0.9mm. The Ruger RXM dowel pin heads are easily 2x this. Consequently, a Holosun K series optic will not fit flat to the slide without an adapter plate.

Image

Diagram from www.optics-trade.eu

The Ruger optic dowel pin inserts in the RXM slide were a VERY tight fit. I had to tap one of them with a delrin hammer to snug it into place. The others slithered in fine. I didn't notice any play at all, between the pins and the slide.

As much as I've messed around with optics, I should have seen this coming. But it's nice to get the tools out and actually compare the RMSc pattern slide (RXM) with the Holosun footprint ("k series").

Ah well. Back to irons for a while longer.

Image
 
I was able to fit my 507C no problem. Yes, the K models have very shallow indentations for the posts or bosses. Had to mill a G48's lugs down to fit a K model. My RXM boss Insets also dropped in. No tapping.

@LarryNBoise Although taking it out without cleaning isn't advisable, you hinted at that, that striker issue should not happen, period. I'd call Ruger. New design, so lemons are going to happen.

My RXM has already passed 1K in 3 range trips, and the only issue I've had was with PMAGs, and JHP ammo. Using Gen 5 Glock 19 mags, zero issues. Several hundred of that 1K were that defensive load I'd use to carry. Solid performance for me.

Here's a link to my big running post and range reps on Glock talk.

 
While I agree with you, this is from the RXM manual:

View attachment 248955
Yeah, I call BS on Ruger for that one lol. Mine had all that white grease in it, which I did take mine straight to the range without cleaning; an unusual deviation from my normal pattern. I always clean first, as there can be literal metal shavings, debris, artifacts, etc.
 
I was able to fit my 507C no problem. Yes, the K models have very shallow indentations for the posts or bosses. Had to mill a G48's lugs down to fit a K model. My RXM boss Insets also dropped in. No tapping.

@LarryNBoise Although taking it out without cleaning isn't advisable, you hinted at that, that striker issue should not happen, period. I'd call Ruger. New design, so lemons are going to happen.

My RXM has already passed 1K in 3 range trips, and the only issue I've had was with PMAGs, and JHP ammo. Using Gen 5 Glock 19 mags, zero issues. Several hundred of that 1K were that defensive load I'd use to carry. Solid performance for me.

Here's a link to my big running post and range reps on Glock talk.

Glock Talk the most contentious club on the net! Lmao
 
Just like Toyota :(
Never heard of it with Toyota, but I'm not a big Toyota guy, and it's not outside the realm of possibility.

Moreover, Ruger does have a history of some of that kinda crap being left in new production guns. They've always been standup in their handling of issues, though, so even when that happened to me it was taken care of super effortlessly.

That's a huge reason I jumped into the RXM game, as I already own a lot of Rugers, but I know if there's any issue Ruger has our back 100%.
 
Glock Talk the most contentious club on the net! Lmao
Yes sir! :D Gotta have thick skin over there, LOL It's one reason I got an RXM, several of them were trashing it before ever holding one. So, I'm like I'm buying one and I'm gonna run the piss out of it and see if I can prove them wrong. I have a detailed write up thread going on that link.

GT is largely a good group of people. :)
 
For those who may not choose to wade through hundreds of posts, this is my RXM as equipped right now. I added the light and 507C for the 3rd range trip going from 620 to 1020 rounds, and it was all about testing WMLs and optics. It ran perfectly with a TLR-1HL and that TLR-7A, and the 507C, and I tested with JHP defensive loads. It also ran 300 rounds of ball ammo flawlessly that day. I run some JHP mags in the very beginning when clean and oiled, then run hundreds of rounds of ball with some cooling in there, and the end, another few mags of JHP. If it can do that, it passes.

It did. :)
Image

Image
 
Been a member a couple years.
Yes, You and @tercel89 are guys I know from over there. I actually re-discovered this site due to some Googling on my P89 and converted it to a P89DC, which worked well. :) I miss this place, so I'm back. It's a slower forum here, too, though.
 
341 - 360 of 1,200 Posts